experience of open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty

To document the outcome of open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction [PUJ] obstruction in terms of renal function and complications. Descriptive study. Department of Urology at Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women Hospital Shaheed Benazir Abad [Nawabshah] from 2007 to 2009. Thirty consecutive cases of pelviureteric junction obstruction were admitted. All patients underwent Anderson-Hynes open pyeloplasty. Complications and outcome were recorded. Most of our patients were male [n=25]. Majority belonged to age group 1-5 year [n=18]. Left side was affected in most of the cases [n=22]. Low incidence of postoperative accepted complications noted. Post operative outcome was excellent In relation to improved drainage and renal function. Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was safe, with low postoperative complication rate and better renal function preservation

comparative study of trans urethral resection versus trans urethral incision for small size obstructing prostate

To compare the results of transurethral resection of prostate [TURP] with transurethral incision of prostate [TUIP] for small size obstructing prostate. Comparative study. Department of Urology, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for women Hospital Nawabshah, from 2008 to 2010. Patients were divided in TURP and TUIP groups with fifty patients in each. Patients of any age with small size [thirty grams or less] prostate needing surgical intervention were included. TURP was done with conventional technique. In TUIP two deep incisions were made at 5 and 7'O clock positions of the bladder neck using Collings knife. Pre-per and postoperative variables were observed and recorded. All patients were followed up to six months post operatively. A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Mean operative time was 12.4 minutes in TUIP and 22.6 minutes in TURP. Retrograde ejaculation and blood transfusions were less in TUIP than TURP. The improvement in maximum flow rate improved in both the groups. TUIP is as effective as TURP in achieving maximum flow rate but TUIP was superior in terms of shorter operative time, less retrograde ejaculation and less need of blood transfusion